Ms. O'Donnell's A.P. Lit. Block A
Monday, July 2, 2012
Monday, June 18, 2012
Final Exams- College Essay Portfolios
Your AP Literature college essay portfolios are in the guidance office. You are welcome to stop by and pick up your work over the summer.
Thanks for a wonderful year,
Ms. O'Donnell
Thanks for a wonderful year,
Ms. O'Donnell
2012-2013 AA&E Summer Reading (All Grades and levels)
The Academy of Aerospace and Engineering at GHAMAS
SUMMER READING
Entering 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th Grade 2012-13 Academic Year
SUMMER READING
Entering 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th Grade 2012-13 Academic Year
Dear Parents:
The
summer reading assignment for AAE is intended to help your student be better
prepared for the type of reading and writing he or she will encounter next
year. It is imperative that your student completes their summer reading before
the first day of school. Thank you for
your support.
Assignment Overview
During the
summer, students are required to read a text selected by their upcoming English
teacher **All assignments must be typed and MLA formatted. **
Assignment – Incoming 9th Grade: Students
will be required to read Amelia Earhart
and complete the attached assignment.
Additionally, students will choose one text from the list of choice
texts and complete 6 dialectical journals.
There will be a total of two assignments handed in on the first day of
school.
Assignment – Incoming 10th
Grade: Students will be required to read
George Orwell’s 1984 and respond to a
question pertaining to their thoughts, questions, a discussion of the characters,
title, conflict and symbolism. This will
be scored on the twelve-point rubric. Students
will also be annotating the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard
Connell and be prepared for a discussion on the text when school begins. There will be a total of two assignments due
on the first day of school.
Assignment – Incoming 11th AP
Literature and World Literature : Students will
read Apollo 13 by James Lovell,
Jeffrey Kluger as well as “The Voyages of Apollo,” by NASA’s Chief Historian,
Steven J. Dick and President John F. Kennedy’s address and write a paper
considering how American Ingenuity played a critical role in the successful
completion of the aborted Apollo mission.
Students will also learn selected literary terms for a test the first
week of school. World Literature students only will read Oedipus Rex and be ready to read the sequel to it upon returning to
class.
Assignment – Incoming 12th
Grade College and Creative Writing and AP Language and Composition:
Students will read Apollo 13 by James
Lovell, Jeffrey Kluger as well as “The Voyages of Apollo,” by NASA’s Chief
Historian, Steven J. Dick and President John F. Kennedy’s address and write a
paper considering how American Ingenuity played a critical role in the
successful completion of the aborted Apollo mission.
Due Dates:
August 29, 2011 or the first day of school
SELECTIONS
ENTERING
GRADE: 9
|
|
You
must read the required text
These books should all be available
for purchase at your local Barnes & Noble bookstore or online via
Amazon.com or BarnesandNoble.com. Most
of these books should also be available for borrowing at your local public
library.
|
|
American
Literature
|
|
Required
Text for answering questions-
Amelia
Earhart Biography
|
Choose
1 of the following texts for your required reading assignment with
dialectical journals.
Uncle
Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe
I
Know Why the Cage Bird Sings by Maya
Angelou
Walden
by Henry David Thoreau
Einstein’s
Dreams by Allen Lightman
Death
of a Salesman by Arthur Miller
The
Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane
|
ENTERING
GRADE: 10
|
|
You
must read the required texts
This book should all be available for
purchase at your local Barnes & Noble bookstore or online via Amazon.com
or BarnesandNoble.com. Most of these
books should also be available for borrowing at your local public library.
The short story is available to printed out online.
|
|
Power of Voice
|
|
Required
Text -
1984
by George Orwell
“The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell
|
.
|
ENTERING
GRADE: 11
|
|
You
must read the required text
These books should all be available
for purchase at your local Barnes & Noble bookstore or online via
Amazon.com or BarnesandNoble.com. Most
of these books should also be available for borrowing at your local public
library.
|
|
AP Literature
|
World Literature
|
Required
Text
Apollo
13 by James Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger
Literary
Terms packet (Exam first week of class)
|
Required
Text
Oedipus
Rex by Sophocles
Apollo
13 by James Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger
Literary Terms packet (quizzes
throughout first weeks of school)
|
ENTERING
GRADE: 12
|
You
must read the required text and one additional text.
These books should all be available
for purchase at your local Barnes & Noble bookstore or online via
Amazon.com or BarnesandNoble.com. Most
of these books should also be available for borrowing at your local public
library.
|
AP Language and Composition
|
Required
Text
Apollo
13 by James Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger
|
ENTERING
GRADE: 12
|
You
must read the required text and one additional text.
These books should all be available
for purchase at your local Barnes & Noble bookstore or online via
Amazon.com or BarnesandNoble.com. Most
of these books should also be available for borrowing at your local public
library.
|
College and
Creative Writing
|
Required
Text
Apollo
13 by James Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger
|
Assignment incoming 9th Grade –
For the Amelia Earhart book, entitled The Fun of it, students will answer the following questions in a paragraph response: These responses must be typed and MLA formatted.
1)
How did the different
occupations or jobs that Amelia Earhart had impact her life and the choices
that she made, especially in terms
of her ultimately becoming a woman pilot?
2) Earhart gives
details about the contributions made by different women in aviation. Name five
of these women and describe the contributions that they made to aviation.
3) How does Earhart
envision the past, present, and the future of aviation?
4) What is Earhart’s
view on gender equality in the aviation world?
Dialectical Journals
The
term “Dialectic” means “the art or practice of arriving at the truth by using
conversation involving question and answer.”
Think of your dialectical journal as a series of conversations with the
texts we read during this course. The
process is meant to help you develop a better understanding of the texts we
read. Use your journal to incorporate
your personal responses to the texts, your ideas about the themes we cover and
our class discussions. You will find
that it is a useful way to process what you’re reading, prepare yourself for
group discussion, and gather textual evidence for your Literary Analysis assignments.
Procedure:
- As you read, choose passages that stand out to you and record them in the left-hand column of a T-chart (ALWAYS include page numbers).
- In the right column, write your response to the text (ideas/insights, questions, reflections, and comments on each passage)
- If you choose, you can label your responses using the following codes:
- (Q) Question – ask about something in the passage that is unclear
- (C) Connect – make a connection to your life, the world, or another text
- (P) Predict – anticipate what will occur based on what’s in the passage
- (CL) Clarify – answer earlier questions or confirm/disaffirm a prediction
- (R) Reflect – think deeply about what the passage means in a broad sense – not just to the characters in the story. What conclusions can you draw about the world, about human nature, or just the way things work?
- (E) Evaluate - make a judgment about the character(s), their actions, or what the author is trying to say
- Complete journal entries for at least two passages each week. You can earn up to 25 points per week for your journals.
Sample
Dialectical Journal entry: THE THINGS THEY CARRIED by Tim O’Brien
Passages from the text
|
Pg#s
|
Comments & Questions
|
“-they carried like
freight trains; they carried it on their backs and shoulders-and for all the
ambiguities of Vietnam, all the mysteries and unknowns, there was at least
the single abiding certainty that they would never be at a loss for things to
carry”.
|
Pg
2
|
(R)
O’brien chooses to end the first section of
the novel with this sentence. He
provides excellent visual details of what each solider in Vietnam would carry for
day-to-day fighting. He makes you feel
the physical weight of what soldiers have to carry for simple survival. When you combine the emotional weight of
loved ones at home, the fear of death, and the responsibility for the men you
fight with, with this physical weight, you start to understand what soldiers
in Vietnam
dealt with every day. This quote sums up the confusion that the men felt
about the reasons they were fighting the war, and how they clung to the only
certainty - things they had to carry - in a confusing world where normal
rules were suspended.
|
Choosing Passages from the Text:
Look for quotes that seem significant,
powerful, thought provoking or puzzling. For example, you might record:
- Effective &/or creative use of stylistic or literary devices
- Passages that remind you of your own life or something you’ve seen before
- Structural shifts or turns in the plot
- A passage that makes you realize something you hadn’t seen before
- Examples of patterns: recurring images, ideas, colors, symbols or motifs.
- Passages with confusing language or unfamiliar vocabulary
- Events you find surprising or confusing
- Passages that illustrate a particular character or setting
Responding To the Text:
You can respond
to the text in a variety of ways. The
most important thing to remember is that your observations should be specific
and detailed. You can write as much as you want for each entry. You can use looseleaf paper for your journals
or download the template from the Author Study page on the ESA web site.
Basic Responses
- Raise questions about the beliefs and values implied in the text
- Give your personal reactions to the passage
- Discuss the words, ideas, or actions of the author or character(s)
- Tell what it reminds you of from your own experiences
- Write about what it makes you think or feel
- Agree or disagree with a character or the author
Sample Sentence Starters:
I really don’t understand this because…
I really dislike/like this idea because…
I think the author is trying to say that…
This passage reminds me of a time in my life
when…
If I were (name of character) at this point I
would…
This part doesn’t make sense because…
This character reminds me of (name of person)
because…
|
Higher Level Responses
- Analyze the text for use of literary devices (tone, structure, style, imagery, conflict, symbolism, theme, irony etc.)
- Make connections between different characters or events in the text
- Make connections to a different text or world event
- Discuss the words, ideas, or actions of the author or character(s)
- Consider an event or description from the perspective of a different character
- Analyze a passage and its relationship to the story as a whole
Assignment incoming
10th Grade - CAPT Prompt Question #1
Forming Understanding of 1984 by George Orwell
(1)
What are your
thoughts and questions about the story? You might reflect upon the characters,
their problems, the title and symbolism in the text.
A. In a one page typed response, you must address each part
of this 6 part question: 1 question you had after reading the text; 1
culminating thought about the text; a brief discussion of what type of
character this is (round, flat, static, dynamic) and why; discuss what type of
conflict this is (man vs. man, man vs. self, man vs. nature, man vs. society
etc); discuss why the title has that name; and a major symbol in the
text-(hint-the title is not a symbol).
This
typed page must be MLA formatted
(2)
Students must also print out a copy of “The Most Dangerous
Game” by Richard Connell and bring it to class fully annotated for an in-class
discussion of the text.
A. Things to
annotate for include: tone, mood, conflict, foreshadowing, theme, motif,
antithesis, symbolism, identifying the protagonist and antagonist and
characterization of each including whether they are round, flat, static or
dynamic characters, point of view, anything unique about the author’s style,
use of metaphor, simile, imagery, personification, and irony.
Incoming 10th Grade -
Response to Literature Rubric
Each score category contains a range of
student responses that reflect the descriptions given below.
Score Point 6
The response
demonstrates:
· a basic understanding of the whole
story; interpretation is perceptive and richly supported with
examples from the text
· an exceptional ability to
reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial understanding
· perceptive associations/connections between the
text, other texts, and/or outside experiences; supports these
connections with examples from the text
· perceptive judgments about the literary quality
of the text; supports these
judgments with examples from the text, other texts, and/or outside experiences
Score Point 5
The response
demonstrates:
· a basic understanding of whole
text; interpretation is thoughtful
and well supported with examples from the text
· an acceptable ability to
reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial understanding
· associations/connections between the
text, other texts, and/or outside experience; generally supports these
connections with examples from the text
· thoughtful judgments about the literary quality
of the text, generally supports these judgments with examples from the
text, other texts, and/or outside experiences
Score Point 4
The response
demonstrates:
· a basic understanding of the whole
text; a plausible interpretation
is supported with some examples from the text
· some ability to reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial
understanding
· some associations/connections between the text, other texts,
and/or outside experience, may not be supported with examples from the
text
· some judgments about the literary quality of the text; lacks
depth and/or is not generally supported with examples from the text,
other texts, and/or outside experiences
Score Point 3
The response
demonstrates:
· some understanding of portions of the text or text as a
whole; interpretation lacks insight
and/or support from the text
· limited ability to reflect, revise, reshape,
and/or deepen initial understanding
· an association/connection between the text, other texts,
and/or outside experience, superficial, lacks depth and/or support
· judgments about the literary quality of
the text; tends to be formulaic
and/or lacks examples from the text, other texts, and/or outside
experiences
Score Point 2
The response
demonstrates:
· a literal or superficial understanding of portions of the text
or the text as a whole
· little or no ability to reflect, revise, reshape,
and/or deepen initial understanding
· difficulty in making or supporting an association/connection between the
text, other texts, and/or outside experiences
· superficial or emotional judgments about the literary quality of
the text or no support with examples from the text other texts, and/or
outside experiences
Score Point 1
The response
demonstrates:
· limited understanding and/or serious
misunderstanding of portions of the text or the text as a whole
· little or no ability to reflect, revise, reshape,
and/or deepen initial understanding
· no meaningful associations/connections between the
text, other texts, and/or outside experiences
· no awareness of the literary quality of the text
Welcome to an extremely rewarding and challenging English course. The
purpose of this letter is to explain your summer reading responsibilities.
These assignments are designed to give you a jump start on the task at hand,
preparing you for college writing assignments and for some of you, the AP exam
in May, 2013.
This summer, AP Literature and World Literature students have a
two-part assignment:
Part 1:
This year, the summer reading assignments at The Academy of Aerospace
& Engineering will reflect our Magnet Theme. To that end, AP Literature students will be
reading Apollo 13, by James Lovell,
Jeffrey Kluger as well as “The
Voyages of Apollo,” by
NASA's Chief Historian, Steven J. Dick and President John F. Kennedy’s
address at Rice University,
Houston, Texas,
concerning the nation's efforts in space exploration. In his speech, the President discusses the
necessity for the United
States to become an international leader in
space exploration and famously states, "We choose to go to the Moon in
this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because
they are hard."
Your assignment:
American athlete Bob Richards once said, “Ingenuity,
plus courage, plus work, equals miracles.”
Consider how American ingenuity played a critical role in the successful
completion of the aborted Apollo 13 mission.
In your paper, integrate details from the book, Apollo 13, “The Voyages of Apollo,” by NASA's Chief Historian, Steven J. Dick as well as John
F. Kennedy’s address at Rice
University.
Papers should:
- Be between 500-750 words
- Follow the MLA format, parenthetical citations & conventions of standard written English.
- Indicate a clear thesis.
- Provide clear and consistent support/evidence.
- Offer appropriate, sequential organization; ideas linked with smooth and effective transitions.
- Indicate a sophisticated, academic vocabulary.
- Reflect editing attention to details, editing, grammar, punctuation, etc.
Typed papers are due on Friday, September 7th.
Part 2:
Learn and study the designated literary terms. Students who have selected AP Literature will
take a test on the selected literary terms during the first week of school.
This first test will serve as a baseline for future literary term tests, please
note, a solid understanding of these terms is necessary for the successful
completion of this course.
I look forward to a working with you in AP Literature. Enjoy your summer vacation and come back to
school refreshed and reinvigorated.
~ Ms. O’Donnell
Sodonnell@crec.org
Advanced Placement
Literature & Composition:
Literary Terms
for first exam
Alliteration
Allusion
Analogy
Anaphora
Anecdote
Antithesis
Apostrophe
Assonance
Ballad Meter
Blank Verse
Cacophony
Caesura
Catharsis
Conceit
Consonance
Couplet
Diction
Didactic Poem
Elegy
Enjambment
Extended Metaphor
Euphony
Foil
Free Verse
Hyperbole
Iambic pentameter
Imagery
Irony
Internal Rhyme
Litotes
Metaphor
Meter
Metonymy
Onomatopoeia
Oxymoron
Paradox
Parallelism
Personification
Poetic Foot
Pun
Refrain
Rhyme
Rhythm
Satire
Simile
Soliloquy
Sonnet
Symbol
Synecdoche
Syntax
Theme
Tone
Understatement
President
John F. KennedyHouston, Texas
September 12, 1962
President Pitzer, Mr. Vice President, Governor, Congressman Thomas, Senator Wiley, and Congressman Miller, Mr. Webb, Mr. Bell, scientists, distinguished guests, and ladies and gentlemen:
I appreciate your president having made me an honorary visiting professor, and I will assure you that my first lecture will be very brief.
I am delighted to be here and I'm particularly delighted to be here on this occasion.
We meet at a college noted for knowledge, in a city noted for progress, in a State noted for strength, and we stand in need of all three, for we meet in an hour of change and challenge, in a decade of hope and fear, in an age of both knowledge and ignorance. The greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds.
Despite the striking fact that most of the scientists that the world has ever known are alive and working today, despite the fact that this Nation¹s own scientific manpower is doubling every 12 years in a rate of growth more than three times that of our population as a whole, despite that, the vast stretches of the unknown and the unanswered and the unfinished still far outstrip our collective comprehension.
No man can fully grasp how far and how fast we have come, but condense, if you will, the 50,000 years of man¹s recorded history in a time span of but a half a century. Stated in these terms, we know very little about the first 40 years, except at the end of them advanced man had learned to use the skins of animals to cover them. Then about 10 years ago, under this standard, man emerged from his caves to construct other kinds of shelter. Only five years ago man learned to write and use a cart with wheels. Christianity began less than two years ago. The printing press came this year, and then less than two months ago, during this whole 50-year span of human history, the steam engine provided a new source of power.
Newton explored the meaning of gravity. Last month electric lights and telephones and automobiles and airplanes became available. Only last week did we develop penicillin and television and nuclear power, and now if America¹s new spacecraft succeeds in reaching Venus, we will have literally reached the stars before midnight tonight.
This is a breathtaking pace, and such a pace cannot help but create new ills as it dispels old, new ignorance, new problems, new dangers. Surely the opening vistas of space promise high costs and hardships, as well as high reward.
So it is not surprising that some would have us stay where we are a little longer to rest, to wait. But this city of Houston, this State of Texas, this country of the United States was not built by those who waited and rested and wished to look behind them. This country was conquered by those who moved forward--and so will space.
William
Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said
that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties,
and both must be enterprised and overcome with answerable courage.
If this
capsule history of our progress teaches us anything, it is that man, in his
quest for knowledge and progress, is determined and cannot be deterred. The
exploration of space will go ahead, whether we join in it or not, and it is one
of the great adventures of all time, and no nation which expects to be the
leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in the race for space.Those who came before us made certain that this country rode the first waves of the industrial revolutions, the first waves of modern invention, and the first wave of nuclear power, and this generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it--we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace. We have vowed that we shall not see space filled with weapons of mass destruction, but with instruments of knowledge and understanding.
Yet the vows of this Nation can only be fulfilled if we in this Nation are first, and, therefore, we intend to be first. In short, our leadership in science and in industry, our hopes for peace and security, our obligations to ourselves as well as others, all require us to make this effort, to solve these mysteries, to solve them for the good of all men, and to become the world's leading space-faring nation.
We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. I do not say the we should or will go unprotected against the hostile misuse of space any more than we go unprotected against the hostile use of land or sea, but I do say that space can be explored and mastered without feeding the fires of war, without repeating the mistakes that man has made in extending his writ around this globe of ours.
There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. Its hazards are hostile to us all. Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation many never come again. But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?
We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.
It is for these reasons that I regard the decision last year to shift our efforts in space from low to high gear as among the most important decisions that will be made during my incumbency in the office of the Presidency.
In the last 24 hours we have seen facilities now being created for the greatest and most complex exploration in man's history. We have felt the ground shake and the air shattered by the testing of a Saturn C-1 booster rocket, many times as powerful as the Atlas which launched John Glenn, generating power equivalent to 10,000 automobiles with their accelerators on the floor. We have seen the site where five F-1 rocket engines, each one as powerful as all eight engines of the Saturn combined, will be clustered together to make the advanced Saturn missile, assembled in a new building to be built at Cape Canaveral as tall as a 48 story structure, as wide as a city block, and as long as two lengths of this field.
Within these last 19 months at least 45 satellites have circled the earth. Some 40 of them were "made in the United States of America" and they were far more sophisticated and supplied far more knowledge to the people of the world than those of the Soviet Union.
The Mariner spacecraft now on its way to Venus is the most intricate instrument in the history of space science. The accuracy of that shot is comparable to firing a missile from Cape Canaveral and dropping it in this stadium between the the 40-yard lines.
Transit satellites are helping our ships at sea to steer a safer course. Tiros satellites have given us unprecedented warnings of hurricanes and storms, and will do the same for forest fires and icebergs.
We have had our failures, but so have others, even if they do not admit them. And they may be less public.
To be sure, we are behind, and will be behind for some time in manned flight. But we do not intend to stay behind, and in this decade, we shall make up and move ahead.
The growth of our science and education will be enriched by new knowledge of our universe and environment, by new techniques of learning and mapping and observation, by new tools and computers for industry, medicine, the home as well as the school. Technical institutions, such as Rice, will reap the harvest of these gains.
And finally, the space effort itself, while still in its infancy, has already created a great number of new companies, and tens of thousands of new jobs. Space and related industries are generating new demands in investment and skilled personnel, and this city and this State, and this region, will share greatly in this growth. What was once the furthest outpost on the old frontier of the West will be the furthest outpost on the new frontier of science and space. Houston, your City of Houston, with its Manned Spacecraft Center, will become the heart of a large scientific and engineering community. During the next 5 years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration expects to double the number of scientists and engineers in this area, to increase its outlays for salaries and expenses to $60 million a year; to invest some $200 million in plant and laboratory facilities; and to direct or contract for new space efforts over $1 billion from this Center in this City.
To be sure, all this costs us all a good deal of money. This year¹s space budget is three times what it was in January 1961, and it is greater than the space budget of the previous eight years combined. That budget now stands at $5,400 million a year--a staggering sum, though somewhat less than we pay for cigarettes and cigars every year. Space expenditures will soon rise some more, from 40 cents per person per week to more than 50 cents a week for every man, woman and child in the United Stated, for we have given this program a high national priority--even though I realize that this is in some measure an act of faith and vision, for we do not now know what benefits await us. But if I were to say, my fellow citizens, that we shall send to the moon, 240,000 miles away from the control station in Houston, a giant rocket more than 300 feet tall, the length of this football field, made of new metal alloys, some of which have not yet been invented, capable of standing heat and stresses several times more than have ever been experienced, fitted together with a precision better than the finest watch, carrying all the equipment needed for propulsion, guidance, control, communications, food and survival, on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and then return it safely to earth, re-entering the atmosphere at speeds of over 25,000 miles per hour, causing heat about half that of the temperature of the sun--almost as hot as it is here today--and do all this, and do it right, and do it first before this decade is out--then we must be bold.
I'm the one who is doing all the work, so we just want you to stay cool for a minute. [laughter]
However, I think we're going to do it, and I think that we must pay what needs to be paid. I don't think we ought to waste any money, but I think we ought to do the job. And this will be done in the decade of the sixties. It may be done while some of you are still here at school at this college and university. It will be done during the term of office of some of the people who sit here on this platform. But it will be done. And it will be done before the end of this decade.
I am delighted that this university is playing a part in putting a man on the moon as part of a great national effort of the United States of America.
Many years ago the great British explorer George Mallory, who was to die on Mount Everest, was asked why did he want to climb it. He said, "Because it is there."
Well, space is there, and we're going to climb it, and the moon and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there. And, therefore, as we set sail we ask God's blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked.
Thank you.
The
Voyages of Apollo
05.30.06

Editor's Note: This is the 20th in a series of essays on exploration by NASA's Chief Historian, Steven J. Dick.
No single essay can do justice to the events
that took place between 1968 and 1972, four years that, as time passes, seem
all the more remarkable for human history. During those years 24 men went to
the Moon, three of them (Lovell, Cernan and Young) twice. Twelve of them
orbited silently above the bleak lunar landscape, and three others were whipped
around the Moon in a "free-return trajectory" in a desperate attempt
to return to Earth after an explosion aboard their spacecraft. Twelve of the 24
lunar voyagers actually landed, spending in total some 300 hours on the
surface, of which 80 hours were outside the lunar module with "boots on
the ground" or actually driving around the spacecraft environs. These
events seem incredible to us even now, as NASA makes plans to return humans to
the Moon almost a half century later.

Astronaut Edwin E."Buzz" Aldrin Jr., Lunar Module pilot, is photographed during the Apollo 11 extravehicular activity on the Moon. He has just deployed the Early Apollo Scientific Experiments Package (EASEP). In the foreground is the Passive Seismic Experiment Package (PSEP); beyond it is the Laser Ranging Retro-Reflector (LR-3); in the center background is the United States flag; in the left background is the black and white lunar surface television camera; in the far right background is the Lunar Module "Eagle". Astronaut Neil A. Armstrong, commander, took this photograph with a 70mm lunar surface camera. Apollo 11 was the first lunar landing.
When the Apollo 11 crew landed on the Sea of
Tranquility on July 20, 1969, they stayed a little less than a day, and Neil
Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin traveled less than a half mile on foot. The last crew
on Apollo 17 landed on the Taurus-Littrow highlands on December 11, 1972 and
stayed for three days during which Harrison Schmitt and Eugene Cernan traveled
some 19 miles in the lunar roving vehicle. Though human footprints are well
preserved at the six landing sites, and rover tracks surround three of them,
not a step has been taken on the lunar surface since that time.
It is well known that geopolitics, in the form
of international rivalry with the Soviet Union,
propelled these first human voyages to the Moon. In the wake of Soviet
successes in space, the Moon program began on May 25, 1961 with President
Kennedy's declaration that the United
States would land a man on the Moon and
return him safely to Earth "before
this decade is out." The larger objective was for the nation
"to take a clearly leading role in space achievement which in many ways
may hold the key to our future on Earth . . . No single space project in this
period will be more exciting or more impressive to mankind, or more important
for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or
expensive to accomplish." While the importance of the Apollo missions is
still debated, the difficulty and the expense are widely recognized. At the
peak of the Apollo era, during one of the most tumultuous decades in American
history, NASA expenditures constituted almost 4% of the federal discretionary
budget. Since that time NASA's budget has remained relatively steady at less
than 1%.
"We are now in a test to see whether humans can
be motivated by a journey of exploration rather than a race, by international
cooperation rather than competition. History will be watching."
|
Eight years after President Kennedy's challenge
the goal was met, but only after gargantuan efforts and funding resources
unlikely ever to be seen again in the space program over such a short time
span. Among those efforts was the construction of the Saturn V launch vehicle,
led by the legendary Wernher von Braun at Marshall Space Flight Center, with
Boeing, North American Aviation, and Douglas Aircraft Company as prime
contractors for each of the Saturn stages. The Apollo spacecraft themselves –
the 'chariots for Apollo' known more technically as the Command and Service
Modules – were also the responsibility of North American Aviation. Hundreds of
subcontractors, thousands of engineers, tens of thousands of workers and many
unsung heroes played their roles in sending Americans to the Moon. The Saturn V
was composed of 3 million parts, the CSM 2 million, the Lunar Module 1 million.
As Apollo 11 astronaut Michael Collins put it, "All 6 million worked,
nearly all the time."
Nor was it only a matter of building complex
hardware and writing novel software for computers than now seem primitive but
performed (mostly) magnificently. It was also a question of managing the
largest technological system ever devised, as Administrator James Webb and his
deputies Hugh Dryden and Bob Seamans sought to ensure high performance,
reliability, and safety. In his book The
Secret of Apollo Stephen Johnson has argued that a new approach known as
systems management, originating from the Air Force's ICBM efforts, played a key
role in the success of Apollo. Indeed, despite the tragic fire that killed
three astronauts in their capsule during the Apollo 1 ground test in 1967, all
the Apollo astronauts were returned safely to Earth, even with the harrowing
experience of Apollo 13.

An extraordinary lunar panorama at Station 4 (Shorty Crater) showing Geologist-Astronaut Harrison H. Schmitt working at the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) during the second Apollo 17 extravehicular activity (EVA-2) at the Taurus-Littrow landing site. This is the area where Schmitt first spotted a mysterious orange soil. Shorty Crater is to the right. The peak in the center background is Family Mountain. A portion of South Massif is on the horizon at the left edge. Apollo 17 was the last voyage of Apollo.
Was it all worth it? The Apollo program has been
criticized for being driven by politics, dominated by engineers, and deaf to
science; after all, the only scientist who traveled to the Moon was Harrison
Schmitt on Apollo 17, the last voyage. What, in the end, did Apollo achieve?
Aside from its geopolitical goals, and despite the clear backseat status of
science, a considerable amount of science was in fact returned from the Moon.
As Donald Beattie has described in his book Taking
Science to the Moon, almost 5,000 pounds of experimental equipment were
landed on the Moon, including the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package
(ALSEP) on each of the last five Apollo missions. 840 pounds of lunar material
were returned and analyzed. 65 miles were traversed on foot or in the lunar
rover in support of field geology and geophysical studies. And during the last
three missions detailed data were collected from the orbiting command and
service modules. The overall result is a much better understanding of the
nature and origin of the Moon and its relation to Earth. The top ten science
discoveries from the Apollo missions, as ranked by the office of the curator
for planetary materials at NASA's Johnson
Space Center,
are found at http://www.lpi.usra.edu/expmoon/science/lunar10.html
But, with the hindsight of history, how real was
the driving force – the race with the Soviets? In his definite study Challenge to Apollo: The Soviet Union and
the Space Race, 1945-1974, Asif Siddiqi finds that there was indeed a
Soviet quest for the Moon, but that it was lukewarm and failed dismally.
"The road to failure began almost as soon as Gagarin had floated down in
his parachute" in 1961, Siddiqi wrote. Nikita Khrushchev hardly took note
of Kennedy's 1961 proclamation, and only sanctioned a piloted lunar landing
program in 1964, the year he was ousted. The military, he writes, was more
interested in missiles than the Moon, and amidst rivalries, organizational
chaos and a shoestring budget, the Soviet effort led to crushing failures.
During 1969-72, while Americans were landing on the Moon, the Soviet N1 rocket
that was supposed to have beaten those Americans saw four catastrophic failures.
Two of them failed in the months immediately preceding the Apollo 11 landing.
The Soviet unmanned lunar program had more success. After failing in an attempt
in February, 1969 – five months before Apollo 11 – they did land two Lunokhod
("Moon walker") rovers in 1970 and 1973. The Lunokhods returned more
than 100,000 images and undertook numerous soil analyses. Although a triumph in
their own right, they were completely overshadowed by the American manned
landings. The Soviets never came close to landing humans – and still have not.
In the wake of losing their half-hearted Moon race, the Soviets turned to space
stations, an endeavor in which they excelled.
No one would have guessed in 1972 that almost a
half century would pass before there was even the possibility that humans would
return to the Moon. Though the Russians would manage several more lunar robotic
missions, including a lunar sample return in 1976, it would be more than twenty
years before Americans would return to the Moon even with a robotic emissary,
the Clementine spacecraft, in 1995. Lunar Prospector followed in 1998, and the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is on schedule to launch in 2008, intended as a
vanguard to human missions now being planned by 2018.
How will history judge the voyages of Apollo?
Pulitzer Prize historian Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., a special assistant to
President Kennedy, ventured one opinion when he wrote in 2004 "It has been
almost a third of a century since human beings took a step on the Moon — rather
as if no intrepid mariner had bothered after 1492 to follow up on Christopher
Columbus. Yet 500 years from now (if humans have not blown up the planet), the
20th century will be remembered, if at all, as the century in which man began
the exploration of space." Although an historian of politics and world
affairs, Schlesinger did not rank war in the century's top ten events. Wars
come and go and affect many people, but the first venture into space happens
only once, and holds infinite promise.
On the other hand there are some, historians
among them, who think the Apollo program was time and money misspent, and that
analogies to Columbus
are misplaced. In reviewing Andrew Chaikin's book A Man on the Moon in the New
York Times Review of Books, historian of technology Alex Roland called
Chaikin's retelling of the Apollo story "the great American legend of the
late 20th century," replete with heroic astronauts and epic
tales. Eschewing Apollo's role in exploration, and pointing to the lack of
science on the missions, he downplayed the significance of the voyages of
Apollo.
Critics are entitled to their opinions, but in
my view the Apollo voyages were an accomplishment of mythic proportions,
justifying mythic retellings. Although historians generally are not in the
business of foretelling the future, in this case I have no qualms in predicting
that, the longer our perspective grows, history will side with Mr. Schlesinger.
Similarly, in the long view of history, the success or failure of NASA's
current attempt to return humans to the Moon, go on to Mars and spread
throughout the solar system will be judged accordingly. We are now in a test to
see whether humans can be motivated by a journey of exploration rather than a
race, by international cooperation rather than competition. History will be
watching.
Further Reading
A tremendous
amount of information on astronaut lunar surface activities.
Beattie, Donald A. Taking Science
to the Moon: Lunar Experiments and the Apollo Program (Johns Hopkins
University
Bilstein, Roger. Stages
to Saturn: A Technological History of the Apollo/Saturn Launch Vehicles (NASA SP-4206, 1980 and 1996). Online at http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4206/sp4206.htm
Brooks, Courtney,
James Grimwood and Loyd S. Swenson, Jr., Chariots
for Apollo: A History of Manned Lunar Spacecraft (NASA SP 4205, 1979).
Available online at
Chaikin, Andrew, A Man On The
Moon: The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts (New York, 1994). The basis for
the HBO miniseries From the Earth to the Moon.
Collins, Michael,
Liftoff: The Story of America's Adventure in Space
(New York, 1988).
Compton, W. David. Where No Man Has Gone Before: A History
of ApolloLunar Exploration Missions. NASA SP-4214 (Washington, 1989). Available online at http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4214/cover.html
Gray, Michael. Angle of Attack: Harrison
Storms and the Race to the Moon (Penguin, 1994)
Hansen, James R. First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong
(Simon and Schuster, 1975).
Johnson, Stephen
B. The Secret of Apollo: Systems
Management in American and European Space Programs (Johns Hopkins U Press, 2002).
Lambright, W.
Henry, Powering Apollo: James E. Webb of
NASA (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).
Lunar and
Planetary Science Institute. An extensive source of information on past and
future missions to the Moon is found at http://www.lpi.usra.edu/expmoon/
Orloff, Richard
W. Apollo By the Numbers: A Statistical
Reference (NASA SP 2000-4029, 2000). Online at http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029/SP-4029.htm
Seamans, Robert
C. Jr. Project Apollo: The Tough Decisions (NASA SP-2005-4537),
available online at http://history.nasa.gov/monograph37.pdf
Siddiqi, Asif, Challenge to
Apollo: The Soviet Union and the Space Race,
1945-1974 (NASA SP-2000-4408, 2000).
Watkins, Billy. Apollo Moon Missions: The Unsung Heroes
(Praeger, 2006)
Steven J. DickNASA Chief Historian
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)